Planning for disaster risk management: the perspective of Greece and Albania on envisioning resilient futures. Varsami (Ersi) ZAFEIRIOU, Prof. Dr. Besnik ALIAJ, Prof. Dr. Pantoleon SKAYANNIS,

Planning for disaster risk management: the perspective of Greece and Albania on envisioning resilient futures. Varsami (Ersi) ZAFEIRIOU, Prof. Dr. Besnik ALIAJ, Prof. Dr. Pantoleon SKAYANNIS,

150 150 Sadmira Malaj
Editions:PDF
DOI: 10.37199/c41000122

Author:
Ph.D. Candidate. Varsami (Ersi) ZAFEIRIOU1
Prof. Dr. Besnik ALIAJ2
Prof. Dr. Pantoleon SKAYANNIS3
Affiliation:
1Leibniz Institute for Ecological Urban and Regional Planning (IOER)
2POLIS University, Albania
3Professor, POLIS, Emeritus Professor, UTH

Abstract

Climate change has (according to many) intensified natural hazards, and exacerbated natural disasters and their human and economic consequences. International organizations (United Na- tions Office for Disaster Risk Reduction- UNDRR, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC, etc.) have established frameworks for disaster prevention, mitigation, reaction, and re- covery. At the same time, the Sustainable Development Agenda 2030 recognizes the need for Dis- aster Risk Reduction for sustainable transformation, with cities being the focal point for achieving safety, inclusiveness, resilience and sustainability on a global level (United Nations, 2015, p. 24). Governments, planners, and academics have also been concerned about the issue of resilience and especially in cities for which there have been projects, such as the exemplary one for the 100 Resilient Cities (2022). Nonetheless, the complex interrelationships between resilient and sus- tainability goals raise the question of whether the two are complementary or contrasting qualities for planning agendas (Ahern, 2011; Saunders & Becker, 2015; Grum & Grum, 2023). Scientific knowledge on disaster risk management and supporting policy discourse are therefore growing, however, losses from natural disasters worldwide increase (CRED, 2022). Different policies are implemented by different governments, but in most cases, they have a common element, an ex- post approach, since they focus on the restoration of disaster damages and rarely include planning for the future (Skayannis & Zafeiriou, 2021). This paper attempts to see the phenomenon from the perspective of two countries (Albania & Greece), to discuss the basic policies for risk management and planning applied in the cases of disasters (except earthquakes), of the two countries and to find the pros and cons of the policies applied, based on a set of criteria.

These criteria are focused on:
•The institutional capacities for socio-ecological and spatial resilience planning in the two coun- tries.
•The level of knowledge (including the transfer of both scientific and indigenous/local knowledge transfer) of stakeholders on hazards, exposure and disaster risk.
•The spatial planning practices for sustainable development and management of uncertainties for disaster risk prevention, and mitigation of future impacts.
The ultimate aim of this paper will be to outline:
•how do the two neighbouring countries shape their disaster risk management visions (where is the focus? on sustainability or resilience? links between them?) • the role of spatial planning in the process of “fabricating” the visions (based on the former criteria).

Published:
Publisher: Polis_press
Tags:

References
Ahern, J., 2011. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), pp. 341-343.
Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=kw-tQgAACAAJ
Aniskoff, P. & Lumpkins, D., 2011. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101, Version 2.0: Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans Overview Briefing [presentation]., s.l.: FEMA.
Batty, M., 2008. Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling Interactions, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies. UCL Working Paper Series.
Brunetta, G. & Caldarice, O., 2020. Spatial Resilience in Planning: Meanings, Challenges, and Perspectives for Urban Transition... In: W. Leal Filho , και συν. επιμ. Sustainable Cities and Com- munities.. επιμ. s.l.:Springer, Cham., p. 628–640.

Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B. H., Anderies, J. M. & Abel, N., 2001. From metaphor to measurement. Resilience of what to what?. Ecosystems, Τόμος 4, pp. 765-781.
CRED, 2022. 2021 Disasters in numbers, Brussels: CRED.
Cremen, G., Galasso, C., & Zuccolo, E. (2022). Investigating the potential effectiveness of earth- quake early warning across Europe. Nature Communications, 13(1), 639. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-021-27807-2

Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), pp. 253-267.
Fournier d’Albe, E. M. (1985). The quantification of seismic hazard for the purposes of risk assess- ment. 77–84.

Freddi, F., Novelli, V., Gentile, R., Veliu, E., Andreev, S., Andonov, A., Greco, F., & Zhuleku, E. (2021). Observations from the 26th November 2019 Albania earthquake: The earthquake en- gineering field investigation team (EEFIT) mission. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(5), 2013–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01062-8

Gallopín, G. C., 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), pp. 293-303.
General Secretariat for Civil Protection, 2005. Report and information on disaster reduction for Greece for the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (Kobe-Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005), Athens: General Secretariat for Civil Protection.

Gountromichou, C., Manousaki, M., Doga, A., & Eythimios Lekkas. (2014). SEISMIC DISAS- TER PREPAREDNESS POLICY IN RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING -GREECE. https://doi. org/10.13140/2.1.1054.3365
Government Gazette 1108/Β’/ 21-07-2010, 2010. Gov 2010. Flood risk assessment and manage- ment, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2007/60/ EC ‘On flood risk assessment and management’, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007. Ath, Athens: Greek Government.

Government Gazette 423Β, 10.04.2003. Approval of the General Plan of Civil Protection on 7.4.2003 codenamed ‘Xenocrates’, Athens: Greek Government.
Government Gazzette 161/A, 9.9.2021. Establishment of the Ministry of Climate Crisis and Civil Protection, transfer of services and responsibilities between Ministries., Athens: Greek Govern- ment.

Grum, B. & Grum, D., 2023. Urban Resilience and Sustainability in the Perspective of Global Con- sequences of COVID-19 Pandemic and War in Ukraine: A Systematic Review. 15. 1459. 10.3390/ su15021459. Sustainability, 15(2).
Hewitt, K., 1983. Interpretations of Calamity. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

https://en.rua.gr/, 2023. Google Sends an Earthquake Alert: How to Activate the App. https:// en.rua.gr/.
IPCC. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (C. B. Field, V. Bar- ros, T. F. Stocker, & Q. Dahe, Eds.; 1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139177245

IPCC. (2023). IPCC:2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (p. 3056) [Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. Cambridge University Press.
Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited: The Concept of Resilience Revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x

Matyas, D., & Pelling, M. (2015). Positioning resilience for 2015: The role of resistance, incremen- tal adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters, 39(s1), s1–s18. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12107
Mavroulis, S., Ilgac, M., Tunçağ, M., Lekkas, E., Püskülcü, S., Kourou, A., Sextos, A., Mavrouli, M., Can, G., Thoma, T., Manousaki, M., & Karveleas, N. (2022). Emergency response, interven- tion, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW = 7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20(14), 7933–7955. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10518-022-01317-y

McGahan, P., 1986. Urban Sociology in Canada. Toronto: Butterworth and Co., Ltd.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Moser, S., Meerow, S., Arnott, J., & Jack-Scott, E. (2019). The turbulent world of resilience: Inter- pretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue. Climatic Change, 153(1–2), 21–40. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
O’Keefe, P., Westgate , K. & Wisner, B., April 15 1976. Taking the Naturalness out of Natural Dis- asters. Nature. 260.. Nature, Band 260, p. 566–567.
Papazachos, B. & Papazachos, C., 2003. The earthquakes of Greece. In Greek επιμ. Thessaloniki: Ziti Publications.
Plate, E. J., & Kron, W. (1994). The international decade for natural disaster reduction (IDNDR): A challenge to science. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 13(1), 45–48. https://doi. org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)90040-X
RESILIENCE. (2022). RESILIENCE, 2022, Resilience planning & development needs of re- gional authorities and stakeholders (D1.1, p. 66). RESILIENCE Consortium, 2021. https:// regilience.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/REGILIENCE_D1.1-Resilience-planning-develop- ment-needs-of-regional-authorities-and-stakeholders.pdf
Renn, O., 2008. Concepts of Risk, An Interdisciplinary Review - Part 2: Integrative Approaches. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17(2), p. 196–204.
Rockefeller Foundation. (2019). Resilient cities, resilient lives: Learning from the “100RC net- work” (p. 140). Rockefeller Foundation.

https://resilientcitiesnetwork.org/downloadable_resources/UR/Resilient-Cities-Resilient-Lives- Learning-from-the-100RC-Network.pdf
Saunders, W. & Becker, S., 2015. A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. International Journal of Disas- ter Risk Reduction, Τόμος 14, pp. 73-81.

Skayannis, P. & Zafeiriou, E., 2021. Risk – Uncertainty – Complexity and Foresight as alternative planning tools for natural disasters: The Medicane ‘Ianos’ in Greece. Annual Review of Territorial Governance in the Western Balkans, Τόμος 3.
The Rockefeller Foundation, 2022. 100 Resilient Cities, s.l.: s.n.

Toto, R., 2020. Building Resilience For Local Governments In Albania: Legal And Institutional Challenges, s.l.: Co-PLAN Resilience Series.
UN. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN. sus- tainabledevelopment.un.org

UNDRR, 2018. sendaimonitor.undree.org, s.l.: UNDRR.
UNISDR, 2009. 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
United Nations, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,s.l.: UN General Assembly.

Vassi, A., Siountri, K., Papadaki, K., Iliadi, A., Ypsilanti, A., & Bakogiannis, E. (2022). The Greek Urban Policy Reform through the Local Urban Plans (LUPs) and the Special Urban Plans (SUPs), Funded by Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). Land, 11(8), 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land11081231
Venghaus, G., 2021. Final Evaluation of the 2019 Albania Earthquake Emergency Appeal, s.l.: IFRC.
WCED UN, 1987. Our common future—The Brundtland report, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.