Disaster Risk Reduction within Complex Urban Systems. Endri DURO
Author: Dr. Endri DURO
Affiliation: POLIS University
Abstract
In the dynamic realm of urban systems, it is well known that natural disasters impose great challenges that hinder the sustainable development of such systems. The initial approaches towards cities and their sustainable development had the tendency of a fragmentary analysis. Thus, urban elements of different scales were seen separately without carefully considering the interdepend- ency. Modern approaches tend to analyze such systems as a whole, complex unit in which every constituting element in different scales is analysed in relationship to other elements as part of a greater system. Nevertheless, disasters seem to be on rise worldwide (Gaillard and Mercer, 2012) reflecting an inability to properly adapt to such hindering hazardous events. The aim of this paper is precisely to reflect on the importance of holistic approaches and the challenges such approaches impose from knowledge and implementation point of view taking into account the multiscale dynamics of cities. Through an analysis of the current state-of-the-art, the paper tries to give an overview on “knowledge” and “implementation” point of view in terms of Disaster Risk Reduc- tion(DRR) and the complexity within Urban Systems.
References
[1] Beinat, E. (2012). Value Functions for Environmental Management. Dordrecht: Spring- er.
[2] Bozza, A., Asprone, D., Fabbrocino, F. (2017). Urban Resilience: A civil engineering perspective. Sustainability 103(9). doi:10.3390/su9010103
[3] Cimellaro, G. P. (2016). Urban Resilience for Emergency Response and Recovery. Fundamental Concepts and Applications (1 ed.). Switzerland: Springer Cham. doi:https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
[4] Dickson, E., Baker, J., Hoornweg, D., & Tiwari, A. (2012). Urban Risk Assessment. Un- derstanding Disasters and Climate Risk in Cities. Washington: The World Bank.
[5] Duro E. (2023). A multi-criteria methodology for the integration of Risk Assessment into Spatial Planning as a basis for territorial resilience. The case of Seismic Risk. PhD Disserta- tion. Ferrara, Italy.
[6] Gaillard, J. C., & Mercer, J. (2012). From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93-114. doi:10.1177/0309132512446717 [7] Gallotti, R., Sacco, P., De Domenico, M. (2021). Complex Urban Systems: Challenges and Integrated Solutions for the Sustainability and Resilience of Cities. Hindawyi Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1782354
[8] Huang, Ch., Liou, J., Chuang, Y. (2014). A method for exploring the interdependen- cies and importance of critical infrastructures. Knowledge-Based Systems 55. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.010
[9] Kanno, T., Koike, S., Furuta, K. (2018). Human-centered modeling framework of multi- ple interdependency
[10] in urban systems for simulation of post-disaster recovery processes. Cognition, Tech- nology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0510-2
[11] Malczewski, J. (2000). On the use of Weighted Linear Combination Method in GIS: Common and Best Practice Approaches. Transaction in GIS, 4(1), 5-22.
[12] McClymont, K., Bedinger, M., Beevers, L., Visser-Quinn, A., Walker, G.H. (2022). Un- derstanding urban resilience with the urban systems abstraction hierarchy (USAH). Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103729
[13] Palliyaguru, R., Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. (2014). Constructing a holistic approach to disaster risk reduction: the significance on focusing on vulnerability reduction. Disasters 38(1). doi:10.1111/disa.12031
[14] Rus, K., Kilar, V., & Koren, D. (2018). Resilience Assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: A new literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
[15] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[16] Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences, 83-98.
