The research as a decision-making process A viable system’s perspective
Authors: Xhimi Hysa
Affiliation: POLIS University
The human being and its relation to the territory is symbiotically related to the evolution process. During the evolution, humans, like other species too, have always been in search for survival as an ultimate goal to conserve the viability of the system (i.e., the belonging class). Therefore, individuals are viable systems which aim the finality of survival through a dynamic equilibrium and homeostatic processes with supra-systems and subsystems with which they attempt to ensure states of consonance (structural compatibility) and resonance (systemic interaction) (Barile et al., 2019; Beer, 1985). To do so, they must decide and act, while searching for meaning that is their subjective perception on problems1 and opportunities. The search for meaning is a natural tendency of human beings as they are inclined to attenuate the environmental entropy by giving a sense to the stimuli of the surrounding context, going from a composition of parts towards the whole. In research, the measurement of meaning has been performed through the well-known scale of semantic differential, usually a 7-point scale of semantic values that describes an attribute or a person’s attitude towards something (Osgood et al., 1957). Consequently, the individual behaves as an observing system, filtering information and constructing its own “invented reality” (von Foerster, 2003; Watzalick, 1984). In the field of architecture, environment, and territorial planning, the attitudes of the observer – which might be an academic researcher, an entrepreneur, a policy maker, or even the whole society – towards the territory and its ecosystem components are of a fundamental importance (Swanwick, 2009; Foroudi et al., 2020; Khandan and Rezaei, 2022).
Reference List
Augier, M., March, J.G (Eds.). (2004). Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Massachusetts: MIT Press;
Barile, S. (2009). Management Sistemico Vitale: Decidere in contesti complessi. Torino: Giappichelli;
Barile, S., Bassano, C., Calabrese, M., Confetto, M., Di Nauta, P., Piciocchi, P., Polese, F., Saviano, M., Siano, A., Siglioccolo, M., & Vollero, A. (2011). Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management: A Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Avellino: International Printing Editore;
Barile, S., Hysa, X., Calabrese, M., & Riolli, L. (2019). Group dynamics and systems thinking: interdisciplinary roots, metaphors and applications. Cybernetics and Systems (pp. 109-113). Routledge;
Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Chichester: Wiley;
Foroudi, M. M., Balmer, J. M., Chen, W., Foroudi, P., & Patsala, P. (2020). Explicating place identity attitudes, place architecture attitudes, and identification triad theory. Journal of Business Research, 109, 321-336;
Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself; an inquiry into the psychology of ethics. Rinehart;
Härtel, Ch.E.J., Zerbe, W.J., & Ashkanasy, N.M. (Eds.). (2005). Emotions in Organizational Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;
Iandolo, F., Barile, S., Armenia, S., & Carrubbo, L. (2018). A system dynamics perspective on a viable systems approach definition for sustainable value. Sustainability Science, 13, 1245-1263;
Khandan, P., & Rezaei, H. (2022). A Strategic Attitude to Architectural Design with a Culture-Based Psychological Approach (Case Study: Public Spaces in Kermanshah). Quality & Quantity, 1-26;
Kuhn, T. (2009). La Struttura delle Rivoluzioni Scientifiche. Torino: Einaudi;
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill;
Maslow, A. (1962). Toward a Psychology of Being. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co;
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press;
Pascal, B. (1999). Pensées and other writings. New York: Oxford University Press;
Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. USA: Taylor & Francis e-Library;
Schumpeter, J. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. USA: Taylor & Francis e-Library;
Simon, H.A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan;
Simon, H.A. (1959). “Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science”. The American Economic Review, 49 (3), pp. 253-283;
Swanwick, C. (2009). Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land use policy, 26, 62-75;
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in experimental social psychology, 37(37), 255-343.;
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509-533;
von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag;
Watzlawick, P. (ed.) (1984). The Invented reality: how do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
