Managing Interdisciplinarity in Urban Planning Research
Authors: Luca Lezzerini
Affiliation: POLIS University
In contemporary research, interdisciplinarity is a common condition. This is especially true for urban planning where the need to leverage fast-evolving technology, emerging trends in social habits and globalization are challenging planners.Interdisciplinarity is often stated, and almost always expected. But only seldom is clear what it is really expected from it. Even if the term has a common meaning easy to be understood by all people, as happens with quality, it is often hard to define it in terms of normative expectations. Another aspect of interdisciplinarity is that, following the research phase, a teaching and application phase is frequently present. And is in this phase that issues arise. These issues should be reconducted to the original research but, being it interdisciplinary, there is a probability that the right knowledge domain is missed: a problem arising from technology maybe should be analysed also in urban design to be really solved.Is then important to create positive, effective, feedback to return these issues to the right research domain from the field and from the classroom. In addition, a trending approach is growing to move from interdisciplinarity to trans-disciplinarity, working with the stakeholders. In this paper, the most common and recent best practices are explored and formal definitions and constraints are provided to clarify both the interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary approaches with a special focus on urban planning.
Reference List
"C2 Wiki: People, Projects and Patterns" https://wiki.c2.com/?PeopleProjectsAndPatterns ;
Alexander, C. (1977), A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press;
Zevi, B. (1957) Architecture as space: how to look at architecture. Horizon Press;
Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Social Science Information, 42(3);
Gibbons, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London, Sage;
Domik, G., & Fischer, G. (2010, September). Coping with complex real-world problems: Strategies for developing the competency of transdisciplinary collaboration. In IFIP International Conference on Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society (pp. 90-101). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg;
Reynolds, N. & Turcs ́anyi-Szab ́o, M. (2010). Key Competencies in the Knowledge Society, 324, Springer, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 978-3-642-15377-8;
Hunt, F. & Thornsbury, S. (2014) Facilitating Transdisciplinary Research in an Evolving Approach to Science. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 340-351. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.24038;
Kilov, H. (2004). "Using RM-ODP to bridge communication gaps between stakeholders". Communications H Kilov. Workshop on ODP for Enterprise Computing. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.161.553;
Klein, J. T. (2006) A Platform for a Shared Discourse of Interdisciplinary Education. Journal of Social Science Education, Volume 5, Number 2, September;
Lauer, J. M. (1984) Composition Studies: dappled discipline, Rhetoric Review, 3(1);
Lukasz, S. & Kaminer, T. (2007). Trans-disciplinarity: The Singularities and Multiplicities of Architecture. Footprint. 1. 10.7480/footprint.1.1.663;
Nicolescu, B. (1999) The transdisciplinary evolution of learning. http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/lwf/dl/nicolescu_f.pdf (last accessed April 2023);
Rosenfield, P. L. (1992) The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Sciences and Medicine;
The "Gang of Four": Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, John Vlissides (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley
Tine, H. & Hansen, H. (2023). Synthesis through trans-disciplinarity.
Zhang, J. (2022). On Intercultural Communication Control from the Perspective of Trans-disciplinarity. 10.1007/978-981-16-5912-6_20.
