Author: Sila Ceren VARIS HUSAR, Milan HUSAR, Vladimir ONDREJICKA
Affiliation: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
Abstract
The effect of the time and space on people and the knowledge production is examined with various methods and approaches in different disciplines as economics, geography, development studies, planning and the like. From the socio-spatial perspective, regional development is related in one dimension of how the individual links to one’s environment, both individually and within a community. This research is a part of a wider research project, called REGINNO 1 delves into the regional innovation capacity in Slovakia, specifically explores the interrelation of human agency and local development from the socio-spatial perspective specific to capital city of Bratislava. Human agency refers to the individuals’ capacity and perspective to be involved in the creation of novel ideas and contribution to local knowledge. The socio-spatial perspective acknowledges the interplay between social structures and spatial arrangements, exploring the role of physical environments shape social relations and opportunities for the aforementioned individuals. Human capital capacity fosters a favourable setting for innovation by enabling the sharing of knowledge and resources, and facilitating the formation of networks and partnerships. Based on the findings of this research, there are a number of recommendations of this research for policymakers, and practitioners to foster environments, spaces and planning strategies that empower individuals, promote inclusion, and address socio-spatial diversities in local context.
References:
Blažek, J., & Květoň, V. (2022, May 5). Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional development: the case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1482–1497. https://doi.or g/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054976
Brenner, T., & Broekel, T. (2011). Methodological issues in measuring innovation performance of spatial units. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), pp. 7-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.201 0.528927
Faltan, L. (2009). Bratislava–dilemy súčasného rozvoja (reflexia socio-priestorových súvislostí). Sociológia-Slovak Sociological Review, (4), 329-353.
Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0309132519853870
Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., & Nielsen, H. (2021, November 10). Advancing the treat- ment of human agency in the analysis of regional economic development: Illustrated with three Norwegian cases. Growth and Change, 53(1), 248–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12583
Karnøe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 733-752. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667923
Lenzi, C., & Perucca, G. (2020). The nexus between innovation and wellbeing across the EU space: What role for urbanisation? Urban Studies, 57(2), 323–349. https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098018818947
Magis, K. (2010). Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903305674
Myint, S. W. (2008). An exploration of spatial dispersion, pattern, and association of socio-eco- nomic functional units in an urban system. Applied Geography, 28(3), 168–188. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.02.005
Padło, T., Struś, P., & Gil, A. (2021). Danube as a symbol of Europe. Perception of the river from varied geographical perspectives. PLoS ONE, 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260848.
Petrtýlová, R., & Jaššo, M. (2022). Behavioural mapping and online data as tools for socio-spa- tial analysis of public spaces-Bratislava, Slovakia waterfront case study. GeoScape, 16(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2022-0004
Roebke, L., Grillitsch, M., & Coenen, L. (2022). Assessing change agency in urban experiments for sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 45, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.10.007
Sotarauta, M., & Grillitsch, M. (2023). Studying human agency in regional development. In Re- gional Studies (Vol. 57, Issue 8, pp. 1409–1414). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.20 23.2217224
Šveda, M., Madajová, M., & Podolák, P. (2016). Behind the differentiation of suburban develop- ment in the hinterland of Bratislava, Slovakia. Sociologicky Casopis, 52(6), 893–925. https://doi. org/10.13060/00380288.2016.52.6.290
Wirth, S., Tschumi, P., Mayer, H., & Bandi Tanner, M. (2023). Change agency in social innovation: an analysis of activities in social innovation processes. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 10(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2157324
Yoo, C., & Lee, S. (2016). Neighborhood Built Environments Affecting Social Capital and Social
Sustainability in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 8, 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU8121346.
