Growing thickness as a research methodology

Growing thickness as a research methodology

150 150 Armela Reka

Growing thickness as a research methodology

DOI: 000-000

Author: Laura Boffi
Affiliation:  Ferrara University

According to the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary, ‘thickness’ is the distance between the opposite sides of something, as well as the quality of being thick. From the same dictionary, as an adjective, ‘thick’ also refers to the attribute of things growing close together, with little space between them and in large amounts. If an object is thick, it is difficult to see through it. These definitions look respectively at an object from the outside - recognising its opposite borders, and from the inside - appreciating the things populating the distance between those borders. Thickness consists of the opposite borders with the evolving entities growing within them simultaneously.
Therefore, discussing thickness implies dynamic zooming in and out. In the “Inquiries on Dropull's states of Liminality” workshop in Tirana, February 2019, the concept of thickness was appropriated to describe a desired state of liminality in several southern Albanian territories belonging to the Dropull region. At the workshop kick-off, the instructors highlighted liminal spaces as physical thresholds between the rural and the urban, and the teams were asked to work towards growing a thickness from such boundaries. In the following sections, I will describe the methodology enacted to grow thickness and I will draw an analogy with my PhD research project as it sits in a liminal space between disciplines that need to be scientifically positioned and defined.

Publisher: Polis_press

Reference List

Brown, T., (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), p.84.

Brown, T. and Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. New York, NY: Harper Business.

Clément, G., 2004. Manifeste du Tiers paysage. Paris: Sujet/Objet.

Fux, J. and Mann, A. (1971). The study of counterpoint from Johann Joseph Fux's Gradus ad parnassum.
New York: W.W. Norton.

Gatt, C. and Ingold, T., (2013). From description to correspondence: Anthropology in real time. Design
anthropology: Theory and practice, pp.139-158.

Human centered design. (2011). [Ontario]: IDEO.

Lee, J. and Ingold, T., (2006). Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. Locating the field:
Space, place and context in anthropology, 42, p.67.

Otto, T. and Smith, R.C., (2013). Design anthropology: A distinct style of knowing. Design anthropology:
Theory and practice, pp.1-29.

Schön, D.A., (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-based systems, 5(1), pp.3-14.

Schönberg, A. and Stein, L. (1982). Preliminary exercises in counterpoint. London: Faber and Faber

Schütz, A., (1951). Making music together: A study in social relationship. Social research, pp.76-97.

Suri, J.F., (2001). The next 50 years: future challenges and opportunities for empathy in our science. Ergonomics, 44(14), pp.1278-1289. (2019). [online] Available at: [Accessed 6 Jun. 2019].

YouTube. (2019). BIF 2: Jane Fulton Suri - Finding Inspiration Through the Power Of Observation.
[online] Available at: [Accessed 6 Jun.2019]. (2019). Canzon II a 4, Ch.187 (Gabrieli, Giovanni) - IMSLP/Petrucci Music Library: Free
Public Domain Sheet Music. [online] Available at: Ch.187_(Gabrieli%2C_Giovanni) [Accessed 6 Jun.2019]. (2019). Das wohltemperierte Klavier I, BWV 846-869 (Bach, Johann Sebastian) - IMSLP/
Petrucci Music Library: Free Public Domain Sheet Music. [online] Available at:
Das_wohltemperierte_Klavier_I,_BWV_846-869_(Bach,_Johann_Sebastian) [Accessed 6 Jun.