The Relationship between Urban Form and Infrastructure: A Case Study of Finiq Municipality
Author: Eneida Muhamuçi
Affiliation: PhD IDAUP/ POLIS University
Abstract:
This paper explores the complex relationship between urban form and infrastructure within the Finiq Municipality, shedding light on the evolution of its urban centers over the last three decades. The urban form of Finiq is deeply influenced by its infrastructure, especially the road system and transport networks. Understanding this relationship is essential for sustainable urban development. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the historical development patterns of Finiq Municipality, compact centers, distributed core centers, distributed centers, and linearly dis- tributed settlements and their impact on its current urban form. Evaluating these different development models, the study seeks to identify the challenges and opportunities for the future of the linear urban form as typical for the Finiq Municipality. This research uses a comprehensive approach, utilizing historical analysis, literature review, and qualitative assessment. These methods provide insights into the dynamics between ur- ban form and infrastructure, enabling a thorough examination of past, present, and possible future scenarios. The analysis highlights the important role of infrastructure in shaping the urban form of Finiq Municipality. The findings of this study contribute to the field of architecture by emphasizing the importance of understanding the interaction between urban form and infrastructure. By recognizing the challenges and opportunities presented by different development models, urban planners, and policymakers can make informed decisions to promote sustainable urban development. This research highlights the need for integrated approaches to infrastructure planning and urban design to create livable, resilient cities.
Keywords: Impact, Infrastructure, Transportation, Urban Form.
References:
Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Fractal Cities: A geometry of form and function. Academic Press.
Duany, A., & Talen, E. (2002). Transect planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 245-266.
Soria Y Mata, A. (1968). La città lineare. Mi- lano: Il Sagggiatore.
Kumaraku, LL., & Prifti, J. (2024). Investigat- ing the Formal Relationship between Infra- structure and the Urban Form in Albanian Settlements. Civil Engineering and Archi- tecture, 12(1), 133 - 140. DOI: 10.13189/ cea.2024.120111.
Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainabil- ity and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203-1212. Schwarz, N., & Manceur, A. M. (2015). Analyzing the influence of urban forms on surface urban heat islands in Europe. Journal of Urban Plan- ning and Development, 141(1), A4014003.
Growe, A. (2012). Polycentricity and European Spatial Planning: Evidence from Germany and France. European Planning Studies, 20(2), 229-246.
Hall, P., & Pain, K. (2006). The Polycentric Me- tropolis: Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. Earthscan.
Olazabal, M., Chelleri, L., & Sharifi, A. (2019). Is connectivity a desirable attribute of urban form? Urban Studies, 56(9), 1867-1884.
