Empowering the periphery: regional planning perspective to left-behind places
Empowering the periphery: regional planning perspective to left-behind places
Author: Dr. Sıla Ceren Varış Husar
Affiliation: Postdoctoral researcher and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow, Spatial Planning Department, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
Abstract
Left-behind places, characterized by population decline, economic stagnation, and social decay, present complex challenges that demand regional and place-based plan- ning solutions. Distinguishing the importance of peripheral areas in this perspective is highly crucial, despite their absence from decision-makers’ political agendas as in the case of ne- glecting them due to physical or mental barriers prolongs these disparities. This exploration underlines the regional planning perspective aimed at empowering the periphery, focusing on possible strategies to revive left-behind areas and foster local development. Providing insights from urban planning and regional development, this work discusses the dynamics of decline in the regions and unfolds key principles and approaches for regional level intervention. By emphasizing place-based strategies, this exploration offers input for policymakers, planners, and practitioners seeking to address the spatial disparities and promote different perspec- tives on left-behind places. There are several strategies to employ local resources, and start transformative change, consequently expected to result in advancing the agenda of regional development. Planners must prioritize social infrastructure changes to address diverse needs and promote the well-being of communities within left-behind places, ensuring inclusive local development.
Keywords: Left-behind places, regional planning, empowerment, population decline, planning strategies.
References:
Ascani, A., Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S. (2012). Regional economic development. A Review, SEARCH WP01/03, 2-26.
Beer, A., McKenzie, F., Blažek, J., Sotarauta, M., & Ayres, S. (2020). Every place matters: Towards effective place-based policy. Routledge.
Bingham, L. B. (2011). Collaborative governance. The SAGE handbook of governance, 386-401.
Buldaç, M., Varış, S. C., & Karaoğlu Can, M. (2020). An Evaluation of The Symbolic Meaning of Tile Usage in The City of Kütahya. ICONARCH International Congress of Architecture and Planning, (Iconarch -IV Proceeding Book), 601–620. Retrieved from https:/iconarch.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/ iconarch/article/view/277
Carson, D. B., Carson, D. A., Porter, R., Ahlin, C. Y., & Sköld, P. (2016). Decline, adaptation or transformation: new perspectives on demographic change in resource peripheries in Australia and Sweden. Comparative Population Studies, 41(3-4).
Davoudi, S., Wishardt, M., & Strange, I. (2010). The ageing of Europe: Demographic scenarios of Europe's futures. Futures, 42(8), 794-803.
De Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2019). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Elias, P. (2020). Inclusive city, perspectives, challenges, and pathways. In Sustainable cities and communities (pp. 290-300). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Fiorentino, S., Glasmeier, A. K., Lobao, L., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2024). ‘Left behind places’: what are they and why do they matter?. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 17(1), 1-16.
Fitzgerald, K. G., & Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of aging & social policy, 26(1-2), 1-18.
Gruber, E., Schorn, M., & MA, B. (2019). Outmigrating youth: A threat to European peripheries?. ÖGfE Policy Brief, Vienna.
He, C., & Ye, J. (2014). Lonely sunsets: impacts of rural–urban migration on the left‐behind elderly in rural China. Population, Space and place, 20(4), 352-369.
Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and planning A, 30(9), 1531-1546.
Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 525-546.
Helling, A. L., Berthet, R. S., & Warren, D. (2005). Linking community empowerment, decentralized governance, and public service provision through a local development framework (Vol. 535). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010). Types of multi- level governance. In Handbook on multi-level governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ismagilova, G., Safiullin, L., & Gafurov, I. (2015). Using historical heritage as a factor in tourism development. Procedia-social and Behavioral sciences, 188, 157-162.
Loulanski, T., & Loulanski, V. (2011). The sustainable integration of cultural heritage and tourism: A meta-study. Journal of sustainable tourism, 19(7), 837-862.
MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’for ‘left behind’places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39-56.
Martin, R., Gardiner, B., Pike, A., Sunley, P., & Tyler, P. (2021). Levelling up left behind places: The scale and nature of the economic and policy challenge. Routledge.
Masuda, H., Kawakubo, S., Okitasari, M., & Morita, K. (2022). Exploring the role of local governments as intermediaries to facilitate partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82, 103883.
Nhamo, A., & Katsamudanga, S. (2019). Linking heritage preservation and community development: An assessment of grassroots heritage based projects as vehicles for socio-economic development and sustainable heritage preservation in Zimbabwe. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 21(1), 25-44.
Ott, H., & Rondé, P. (2019). Inside the regional innovation system black box: Evidence from French data. Papers in Regional Science, 98(5), 1993-2026.
Sanetra-Szeliga, J. (2022). Culture and heritage as a means to foster quality of life? The case of Wrocław European Capital of Culture 2016. European Planning Studies, 30(3), 514-533.
Sotarauta, M., & Grillitsch, M. (2023). Studying human agency in regional development. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1409-1414.
Stratigea, A., & Katsoni, V. (2015). A strategic policy scenario analysis framework for the sustainable tourist development of peripheral small island areas–the case of Lefkada- Greece Island. European Journal of Futures Research, 3, 1-17.
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large–scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542- 577.
Van Hoof, J., Kazak, J. K., Perek-Białas, J. M., & Peek, S. T. (2018). The challenges of urban ageing: Making cities age-friendly in Europe. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(11), 2473.
Varış Husar, S. C., Mehan, A., Erkan, R., Gall, T., Allkja, L., Husar, M., & Hendawy, M. (2023). What’s next? Some priorities for young planning scholars to tackle tomorrow’s complex challenges. European Planning Studies, 31(11), 2368-2384.
Wieliczko, B., Kurdyś-Kujawska, A., & Floriańczyk, Z. (2021). EU rural policy’s capacity to facilitate a just sustainability transition of the rural areas. Energies, 14(16), 5050.
